Thursday, November 1, 2012

'NaNoWriMo' begins, and a participant who is now an author offers advice

1:40AM EDT November 1. 2012 - Hear that sound?

That's the sound of scrambling as people participating in NaNoWriMo try to find their Zen as they dive into the start of the race.

National Novel Writing Month. 50,000 words in 30 days. It's now five years since I took part in my first NaNo. ...

So Nov. 1, 2007, I began. 1,667 words a day is the goal of a NaNo -- which puts you at a 50K story by Nov. 30. I had no intention of writing anything more than my travel log. I wasn't a writer!

And then ... something happened.

I finished recording the river trip by the fourth or fifth day in. I couldn't stop writing now -- I hadn't made it out to the first coffee shop meeting! So I started a new story. Something for my teenage kids, full of river elves and humans, and secrets invasions of a fantasy land. I had Tolkien, and Eddings, and all the McCaffrey I'd ever read flooding my mind. So I wrote. And wrote, and wrote some more. Looking back, the story was rather horrific. Really. All the clichés that are, well, cliché? I had them. The story started with one character waking up in the middle of the forest. Backstory fell like rain. To be honest, the entire thing sucked badly, but I was having so much fun, I never noticed.

Caught that? It was fun. I might not have been a writer, but I was a storyteller, and having a damn good time doing it.

My craft improved even over the course of the project, but the biggest lesson I learned from that first NaNo was keep writing. I had motivation a'plenty as my daughter would read my completed pages each day and expect the NEXT chapter the following day. She didn't care the story wasn't polished, or had plot holes an elephant could fall into. She was all ... "More. What happened next?" To this day, that's one of my mantras when I write.

Long story short, I wrote over 100,000 words that November. The adventure led me to find e-books, and by March 2009 I had my first book published (Wolf Signs). I've just signed my 24th contract with Samhain Publishing, my 30th contract overall.

Five years.

So for those of you who have leaped into NaNo 2012, I give you two bits of advice.

Read the full article, including the advice, at USA Today: http://www.usatoday.com/story/happyeverafter/2012/11/01/national-novel-writin...

I won't be doing the NaNoWriMo of 2012, but I will keep writing. And reading. And striving.

That's what writers do: they are writers. Twaddle, rants, fantasy, reality: always writing.

- Jon O

Posted via email from Jon Osterholm :: WMBC :: posterous

Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Scary! The sucking noise of greater taxation is coming January 2013

From San Francisco Business Times article by Martin Calvey, "George Lucas saves hundreds of millions in taxes by selling before year-end," we see what will be a trend to avoid the sucking noise that is government taking taxes for who-knows-what from the private sector after January 1. 2013.

...The bottom line: Taxes matter.

Just take a look at the prospect of federal capital gains rates jumping from 15 percent to 20 percent next year on Lucas' sale. At a sales price of $4.05 billion, the 5 percentage point tax increase represents a higher tax tab of about $200 million — and that's just the capital gains tax. Half the purchase price in the Disney-Lucas deal is in the form of 40 million shares of Disney (NYSE: DIS) stock, which would avoid capital gains.

Then there's the 3.8 percent Medicare surtax on investment income, including capital gains, that kicks in next year. Do you see how the taxes start adding up on a $4 billion deal?

Plus the $5 million gift-tax exemption drops to $1 million, prompting several business owners of far lesser means than Lucas to decide now is the time to sell what took a lifetime to build.

via bizjournals.com:

http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/2012/10/disney-lucas-fiscal-clif...

Money which will be going to increased butt-covering by an irresponsible, in-denial federal government, could be used by the private sector, instead, to hire, expand and otherwise boost the true economy next year (yes, by "true economy" I mean the part that is not all about government spending and contract-swapping, kids). But there is this creepy conviction among some of the leaders in Washington, D.C., that government spending is king, not the private sector that feeds that throne of bureaucracy. In lieu of actual responsible budgeting and reduction of bureaucracy -- despite what the president says on the campaign trail -- we will not be going down a road of fiscal sanity.

Government is too big, and the suggestion, overwhelmingly, seems to be that it needs to be bigger, not smaller. The way to save the country is to let government run wild, not to suck it up and make cuts where we must, change entitlement programs where they will otherwise collapse in 20 years, 30 years, or whatever. The best thing to do, it seems we are being led to believe, is to accuse those who talk about real common sense, address the problems with long-view honesty and culpability, that refer to the private sector and hard-working citizens as the heroes of the economy, not government, that they are ogres. That's scary.

Happy Halloween.

Posted via email from Jon Osterholm :: WMBC :: posterous

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

$1 billion for bilking: B of A pays big price for ill-timed buyout, more banks to face suits

US suit alleges 'brazen' fraud at Countrywide
(AP, via Boston.com)

Countrywide was a giant in mortgage lending, but was also known for approving exotic, even risky, loans. By 2007, as the market for subprime mortgages collapsed, Countrywide was anxious for revenue.
The lawsuit alleged that the company loosened its standards for making loans while telling Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which were buying loans from Countrywide, that standards were getting tighter.
Fannie and Freddie, which packaged loans into securities and sold them to investors, were effectively nationalized in 2008 when they nearly collapsed under the weight of their mortgage losses.
To churn out more mortgage loans, Bharara said, Countrywide introduced a program called the ‘‘Hustle,’’ shorthand for ‘‘High-Speed Swim Lane.’’ It operated under the motto, ‘‘Loans Move Forward, Never Backward.’’

The lawsuit gives seven examples of mortgages made for homes in California, Alabama, Florida and Georgia in which the borrowers’ income and other qualifications were falsified.
For example, one loan application, for a home in Miami,
said that the borrower was an airline sales representative earning $15,500 per month, when the borrower worked for a temp agency and earned $2,666 per month. The borrower defaulted within seven months, the suit said.

[Bank of America's] purchase, instead of padding Bank of America’s mortgage business, has drawn a drumbeat of regulatory fines, lawsuits and losses.
Bank of America reported last week that while it is issuing more mortgages — $21 billion worth last quarter, up 18 percent from a year earlier — its mortgage unit is still losing money as the bank works through crisis-era problems.
In the past year and a half, [federal prosecutor Preet] Bharara's office has settled lawsuits against CitiMortgage, Flagstar Bank and Deutsche Bank over mortgages. Its lawsuits against Wells Fargo and Allied Home Mortgage are pending.

Read more: http://www.boston.com/business/news/2012/10/24/sues-bank-america-for-for-mort...

Fannie and Freddie, one would think from the article, were innocent victims in the mortgage collapse. That's not the case, however. They were, as was B of A, played for fools in this instance, however.

Posted via email from Jon Osterholm :: WMBC :: posterous

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Tea Party rally 'report': Oven mitts and a notable absence of relevance in a story

Tea Party rally draws thousands to Indian River County fairgrounds

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY — They wore oven mitts with pictures of Mitt Romney and hats adorned with tea bags and buttons.

But for the several thousand Tea Party supporters who turned out for a rally Saturday at the Indian River County Fairgrounds, the message was clear — stand up for America by voting on Election Day....

U.S. Rep. Connie Mack IV, who is running against incumbent Democratic Senator Bill Nelson for Nelson's seat, introduced his parents to the crowd, drawing thunderous applause. He asked the crowd if they were ready to take back the Senate, and said he would work hard to put people first if elected.

"With your help, we can get this country moving forward again," said Mack. "We can do this if we all work together."

U.S. Rep. Bill Posey, R-Rockledge, introduced West to the crowd.

"He doesn't talk the walk, he walks the walk," said Posey. "I've never been in an enemy foxhole, but if I had to choose someone to cover my back, it would be Col. Allen West."

Even though West is not on the ticket in Indian River County, he said he was happy to meet so many supporters.

"It's good to be with some true American patriots," West said.

Theresa Wagner from Barefoot Bay said she found the rally to be inspiring.

"Colonel West is an uplifting representative for our state and for our country," Wagner said.

Read the entire article: http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2012/oct/20/tea-party-rally-draws-thousands-to-ind...

Articles such as this one are the reason I often cringe when I read any local news stories -- out of anywhere, and from any source.

TCPalm (Scripps of Treasure Coast/Palm Beaches) reported on an area Tea Party rally that was held on Oct. 20. 2012. It was an article nearly empty of reporting about the rally itself, but good about relaying several folks' reasons for attending. Oh, and gave a big mention to a few folks' penchant for silly hats and other garb. I think I've seen better and more accurate material in a Humane Society pet adoption listing.

This was more like a long-winded news brief. The "reporter" left out pretty much everything except a few platitudes from three speakers, not any useful content from the event. But it mentioned the spirited garb of what may have been two to four people (oven mitts? where were all these people with mitts on?!) out of 3,000 as if it were a group thing. Wasted a lot of space on, uh, fluff? The media outlet did get some comments from audience members, which was nice (I left that portion out in the quote; hit the link to read the whole article).

They left out half of the speakers, in fact, including two women who were among the six or seven speaking guests. I wonder if they were just trying to further inflate the cynical and absurd "war on women" meme against Republicans and conservatives, thereby showing a stiffly leftist, unabashedly Democratic bias?

One woman who spoke has repeatedly been a victim of racially crude verbal attacks and outright threats for being a black female who is politically conservative. The other woman was a California doctor who assured the crowd (hey, I don't know why it wouldn't be true, seeing the long-term impact) that Obamacare is not liked by a large majority of doctors.

I could tell you, the ladies' names, but what's the fun in that? You should contact the reporter or her editors and ask them for the omitted speakers' names. Here's the story link, you can get to them from the site: http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2012/oct/20/tea-party-rally-draws-thousands-to-ind...

- Jon Osterholm

Posted via email from Jon Osterholm :: WMBC :: posterous

Monday, October 22, 2012

Obama, tax depreciation and the economy: Should we just ground aircraft in favor of video?

AIN Blog: Is President Obama Really Calling the Bizav Industry 'Bad'?

... On the one hand, it’s probably time for the president to find new examples of tax breaks that ought to be eliminated. Ending breaks for business aircraft—an apparent reference to bonus depreciation, which was part of the stimulus package Obama himself signed—wouldn’t exactly do much to deflate the national debt....
... As the editor who put together a special issue of Business Jet Traveler called “The Bizav Advantage,” I fully understand that business jets are not used primarily to transport the wealthy from playground to playground; they’re employed by lots of executives and middle managers to boost efficiency and productivity. But let’s get real. Off the top of my head, I can’t think of any poor people who own business jets, nor am I even aware of any struggling businesses that are out shopping for jets at the moment. The companies that are buying and operating aircraft in this or any other economy tend to be the ones that are doing better than most. In fact, studies cosponsored by NBAA have repeatedly suggested exactly that. It’s questionable how many of these companies would actually forgo jet purchases just because the tax break went away....
... Moreover, as I noted in a blog post last year, there are other reasons why the elimination of bonus depreciation for business aircraft buyers might not do significant harm to the industry or the economy. As BJT tax columnist Jeff Wieand has noted, for example, bonus depreciation could ultimately result in higher aircraft prices. Also, the companies that manufacture many of the business jets sold in the U.S. are based outside our borders. As such, a tax break for purchase of their aircraft does little to help the American economy....

COMMENT:
By -------------
on October 22, 2012 - 12:24am
Thanks, Mr. Burger
Kudos to Mr. Burger for the courage to suggest we look past the rhetoric of well-heeled lobbying firms and corporate-funded aviation organizations, those who want to short-circuit any real discussion of how to fund the aviation infrastructure.
The current entitlement program for corporate-jet users, a fuel tax that comes no where near to assuring these affluent freeloaders pay their fair share for services incurred, has got to be revised to a higher percentage. Now. ...
... let's have an end to all the hogwash about how special and important and exceptional these corporate jet users are. That's fatuous self-promotion. Have any of these self-absorbed misfits heard the word “teleconference”, “Twitter”, “GoToMeeting.com”? The term “business travel” is an anachronism, a quaint twentieth-century notion, another example of corporate waste and inefficiency.
AOPA, the NBAA, and other pro-entitlement lobbies never admit that corporate jet flights are currently subsidized by the U.S. Taxpayer, and have been for far too long....
I laugh when I read respondents' claims that the current president is inciting class warfare. Class warfare, my friends, began when Reagan instituted welfare for the wealthy, decades ago. ...
It's become popular, too, to criticize the current president for using Air Force One. The claim: it's a tremendous waste of taxpayer money. I'm sure these respondents were equally critical of Mr. Bush for this same abuse.

I limited quotations of the blog post and the ranting but greatly considered comment. The emphases are all mine. Read more: http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/blogs/ain-blog-president-obama-really-...

My response to some wild pieces of the comment:
To be kind, you cannot connect the dots. You might be suffering from logic deficit disorder. You are trying to wet both sides of the dipstick. Just your last comment alone. I don't have time to go through all your other far-leftist rant.
First, on the matter of [Air Force One] AF1: Not known anyone complaining about Obama using AF1 as wasteful, in some holistic manner, but his having it and not conceding the irony in his chastising business aviation -- he comes off as a top-notch hypocrite.
Second, where you are double-dipping the dipstick: you complain about corporate waste by using aviation, but have issue with people who have an issue with Obama using AF1. You either want it both ways, or you want corporate jets and AF1 grounded. So which is it? Should we also ban space travel, Amtrak, cars, helicopters, boats, or are you just an air travel Luddite?
Third, no broad complaints were made while Bush was POTUS, regarding AF1, because he didn't chastise those who used private sector aviation -- "corporate jet owners" -- on a quarterly basis. He didn't attack people who built companies and ran businesses for cheap political points among the envious and whining masses. You might know some of them.
Obama has been something of a waste of taxpayer money, not specifically for his use of AF1 (short of his overusing it for his political campaign) [but] because he hasn't grasped [the] need for reducing our government. Such a big government leader was the wrong guy when the economy collapsed. A stiff belt-tightening would not have been good, either, but we sure could have used less government and more economic confidence than Obama offered.
His hypocrisy, since you are apparently not grasping it, is in chastising business aviation (you'd prefer we all do everything, like a video gamer, from a chair, I get it) while he enjoys the fruits of this country's greatest aviation symbol. Or, not? Do you have a position, or is your politics essentially undecided -- permanently?






















Monday, October 15, 2012

Two Obama-Biden signs were in front of a Vero Beach restaurant until ICE raided it

The owner of Bangkok restaurant..., along with three other people, have been arrested on charges of paying a federal undercover agent $313,000 to get illegal green cards for 28 workers from Thailand, according to recently released federal court records.... [Sarah] Tipfun is alleged to be the principal conspirator, court documents show. Tipfun handled the money. And she allegedly arranged for the workers to meet the agent at either her home in south Indian River County or at a restaurant in Fort Pierce, also named Bangkok, that she formerly owned.

Some workers were lent money to buy the cards.

During one meeting with the illegal workers, Tipfun told the agent to not count the cash payments in their presence because they had been charged more than the agent asked.

The extra, according to the court documents, went to Tipfun and others who made the arrangements for them to meet with the agent.

When Tipfun first met with the agent, she allegedly agreed to pay $20,000 per card: half up front and half on delivery.

And she offered to introduce the agent to other Thai restaurant owners willing to fraudulently purchase immigration documents for workers, court document shows.

via tcpalm.com:

http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2012/oct/15/owner-of-vero-beach-restaurant-3-other...

While Indian River County is a bastion of Republicans, downtown there were several Obama-Biden signs that I couldn't help but notice as I passed by 14th Street on my way home many days. One such location was Bangkok restaurant. I noticed the day the news reported on the raid occurring that the Obama election signs were no longer there.

What's it mean? Not a lot, but it certainly stuck in my head that a business owner who was operating a hefty illegal underground business was an outspoken proponent of Obama.

And, no, it has nothing to do with draconian immigration laws: this was a for-profit illegal documents operation. This had nothing to do with helping desperate people in some misguided altruistic manner, it seems. The courts will determine that, obviously. Not looking good at all thus far, though.

Posted via email from Jon Osterholm :: WMBC :: posterous

Tuesday, October 9, 2012

Vandals 'occupy' Romney campaign in Vero Beach, Florida

Ceilley said the signs, posted on the frames of what had been campaign signs for Bill McMullen's bid for Indian River Sheriff, cost about $15 each. Cost aside, he said he was more frustrated about the time he spent posting the 45 signs to find them vandalized.

"It makes you furious," he said. "I feel strongly about the importance of this election."

Read more: http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/region_indian_river_county/mitt-romney-political...

From area TV station WPTV.

Whoever does this kind of silliness: grow up. I can only imagine these could have been destroyed by children, but I'll tell you, what kid cares so much that they'd destroy other people's property relating to a political campaign? Ones with really pathetic parents? Yeah, that kind. So sad. Of course, it could be the Democratic Party doing it, for all anyone knows.

There are plenty of juveniles involved with politics.

Give it a rest, babies.

Posted via email from Jon Osterholm :: WMBC :: posterous

Monday, October 8, 2012

Georgian coalition leader reveals his cabinet

"Ivanishvili said last week he will make Washington his first foreign trip should he become prime minister. And his choice for foreign minister, Maia Panjikidze, reiterated Monday the new ruling coalition has no intention of loosening ties with the United States or NATO.

Panjikidze said there will just be a new emphasis on also normalizing relations with Russia.

Russia, which defeated Georgia in a brief war in 2008, has said it hopes Georgia's parliamentary election will help normalize ties between the two countries."

via blogs.voanews.com

http://blogs.voanews.com/breaking-news/2012/10/08/georgian-billionaire-unveil...

Georgia is a country that is what you could call a buffer between Russia and Europe.

Posted via email from Jon Osterholm :: WMBC :: posterous

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Comet C/2012 S1 - could shine brighter than the full moon. Or... not.

Lawrence LeBlond for redOrbit.com – Your Universe Online

Hale-Bopp, Haley’s, McNaught. These are just a few of the more well-known modern comets that have blazed across the night sky in our lifetime. Another comet that has been recently discovered could be added to that list next year when it makes a pass by the Sun in late 2013.

The comet, named C/2012 S1 (ISON), is due to come within 1.1 million miles of the Sun on, or around, November 29, 2013. Vitali Nevski and Artyom Novichonok from Russia, made the discovery using the International Scientific Optical Network’s (ISON) telescope, capturing the images of the comet on 21 September with CCD imagery equipment.

The comet could blaze brightly across the heavens when it does arrive, experts believe. But just how brightly is difficult to determine. And there could be a chance the Sun will just boil it away as it passes, just as happened to comet Elenin last year. If it does survive the encounter, experts speculate it could outshine any comet seen in the last hundred years–perhaps even brighter than the full moon. If so, it should be easily visible to the naked eye for about two months, and could even be visible during daylight.

If the predictions hold true, Comet C/2012 S1 will likely be one of the greatest comet encounters in human history, exceedingly outshining the memorable Hale-Bopp of 1997 and Haley’s Comet in 1986. It could even be a much bigger spectacle than the long-awaited Comet Pan-STARRS, which will make a pass in March 2013.

BRIGHTNESS

The only thing that is certain at this point, is that the large cometary body was discovered just beyond the orbit of Jupiter and it’s orbital trajectory will take it close to the sun next year. The comet is currently very faint, but as it approaches the Sun, it will steadily brighten. It will be easily picked up by experienced amateur astronomers with CCD equipment in the coming months, and will be within binocular view by late summer 2013, and eventually by the naked eye in early November. Depending on brightness, the comet should remain visible to the naked eye from early November 2013 to mid-January 2014

“In the best case, the comet is big, bright, and skirts the sun next November. It would be extremely bright — negative magnitudes maybe — and naked-eye visible for observers in the Northern Hemisphere for at least a couple of months,” Karl Battams, of the NASA-supported Sungrazer Comet Project, told Spaceweather.com.

However, this outcome is far from certain, noted Battams. “Alternately, comets can and often do fizzle out! Comet Elenin springs to mind as a recent example, but there are more famous examples of comets that got the astronomy community seriously worked up, only to fizzle,” he said.

Writing in a blog for the Planetary Society, astronomer Bill Gray pointed out that the comet’s orbit has been very well constrained, but just how bright it will be is anyone’s guess at the moment–“…estimating comet brightnesses a year ahead of time is about like asking who’s going to win the World Series next year.”

“It could be astonishingly bright, or it could fizzle. I think it was David Levy (co-discoverer of Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9) who said that comets are like cats: they have tails, and do whatever they want to do,” Gray remarked.

COMET ORIGINS

Comets originate from the outer limits of the solar system and are generally composed of icy volatiles such as water, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, methane and ammonia. These icy behemoths also contain dust, rocks and any other debris that just happen to be floating around when the Sun evolved. Researchers hypothesize that Comet C/2012 S1 originates from the Oort Cloud, a cloud of frozen comets located about one light year from the Sun possibly containing billions of cometary nuclei that formed during the early days of the solar system when the Sun formed.

“This is quite possibly a ‘new’ comet coming in from the Oort cloud, meaning this could be its first-ever encounter with the sun,” Battams pondered. “If so, with all those icy volatiles intact and never having been truly stressed (thermally and gravitationally), the comet could well disrupt and dissipate weeks or months before reaching the sun.”

As comets close in on the Sun, the increased solar energy puts stress on the celestial orbiter, causing its frozen volatiles to vaporize, bypassing the liquid phase altogether. Sublimation causes the comet’s gases to erupt, sweeping them back by the solar wind, which forms the tail, the common trait of the comet. Depending on the comet’s chemical elements, the journey past the Sun could make the tail spectacularly impressive.

Of course, this will be dependent on what the exact chemical makeup is and how it formed in deep space. And it is very likely the chemical elements may be just the right mixture that it will cause the comet to erupt, fracture and break apart long before it becomes visible to the naked eye. Or, it may whiz by and release very little material, fizzling any excitement of a spectacular showing.

SUNGRAZER

Due to the comet’s scheduled close inspection of our Sun, it will be, what experts call, a sungrazer. Sungrazers are comets that typically pass within a few million miles of the Sun, with some passing even within a few thousand miles. Famous examples of sungrazers are the Kreutz sungrazers and the Great Comets of 1843 and 1882, as well as the Comet Ikeya-Seki of 1965.

Despite the likelihood of breaking up under the increased solar output of the Sun, there remains a slight chance it could become the brightest comet to scream across the skies in the last hundred years–even brighter than Ikeya-Seki, which dazzled astronomers in 1965.

If it lives up to the hype, it will be far brighter than the last bright visitor, Comet McNaught, which gave earthlings in the Southern Hemisphere a good show in January 2007. But then again, it could peter out like Elenin did in 2011, or more famously, the comet Kohoutek, which failed to live up to predictions in 1973.

“This is a very exciting discovery. The comet looks like it could become a very spectacular sight in the evening sky after sunset from the UK in late November and early December next year,” Robin Scagell, vice-president of the Society for Popular Astronomy, told the Telegraph.

“Our members will be eagerly following it as it makes its first trip around the Sun and hoping to see it shining brilliantly and displaying a magnificent tail as it releases powerful jets of gas and dust,” he added.

DOOMSDAY

The debate over the brightness should not spill over into any concerns over the comet’s projected orbit. Doomsayers often get excited when new comets are discovered and start rumors of collision courses with the Earth, such as what happened with last year’s comet Elenin.

Comet C/2012 S1 will not even come remotely close to Earth. Even on its nearest approach in January 2014, it will be 36 million miles from Earth, according to comet hunters at Remanzacco Observatory in Italy.

Gray said the best bet is to just sit back, relax and enjoy the show. “I’d give it about a 30 percent chance of being exciting, with a 60 percent chance that I’m wrong. In other words, it’ll certainly bear keeping an eye on, but I don’t think anyone can say for sure right now.”

LIGHT BRIGHT, EVEN IN DAYLIGHT. That will be an interesting sight. OR... calculations are off and it won't be.

"If the predictions hold true, Comet C/2012 S1 will likely be one of the greatest comet encounters in human history, exceedingly outshining the memorable Hale-Bopp of 1997 and Haley’s Comet in 1986."
redOrbit (http://s.tt/1opdb)

Posted via email from Jon Osterholm :: WMBC :: posterous

Sunday, September 23, 2012

Citizens ought to be in the game, not simply getting benefits from it

It stands to reason that those who have skin in the game—who are helping to pay for all of the government programs—will be more concerned about reining in out-of-control government spending, because they see their taxes going up and the country’s credit rating going down.

On the other hand, if you are on the receiving end of government benefits, that is likely to color your perception of how taxpayers’ money should be spent. According to the Heritage Foundation's 2012 Index of Dependence on Government, 63.7 million Americans, or about one in five, is receiving direct government support from Social Security, welfare, or Pell Grants—and that is at its highest level ever.

http://ow.ly/dVItu - via blog.heritage.org

Nobody wants to disparage those who aren't wealthy - that's crudely not so in other other direction, and hypocritically so, with the tenor of the Obama campaign. Obama has earned millions from sales of every book he wrote about himself. Which, coincidentally, seems awfully self-absorbed for a leader of the free world.

- Jon Osterholm

Posted via email from Jon Osterholm :: WMBC :: posterous

Citizens ought to be in the game, not simply getting benefits of it

Saturday, September 22, 2012

His 47% missed the mark, but Romney's getting treated far too harshly for it

Who's not paying income taxes, and where Romney went wrong, from Daniel Mitchell on Townhall.com :

"Yes, we have almost half of households not paying federal income tax, and I recognize that there’s a risk on an unhealthy political dynamic if people begin to think they get government for free, but those people are not necessarily looking for freebies from government. Far from it. Many of them have private sector jobs and believe in self reliance and individual responsibility. Or they’re students, retirees, or others who don’t happen to have enough income to pay taxes, but definitely don’t see themselves as wards of the state.

If Romney wanted to be more accurate, he should have cited the share of households receiving goodies from the government."

Read it: http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/danieljmitchell/2012/09/22/why_romneys...

From TownHall.com, which Obama fans certainly would not consider a decent source, this is quite reasonable, indeed. It isn't sweet on Obama, but it isn't letting Romney off for his secretly recorded bumbling, either.

This is far from a deal-breaker on Romney. Not if fairness has anything to do with it.

Posted via email from Jon Osterholm :: WMBC :: posterous

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

September 11, 2012: Arab Spring officially ended

The Arab Spring just ended, I suspect. It's not the fault of some independent movie made in the summer of 2011, either. Outright provocation of crazies gets you exactly what we saw this night of September 11, but it was merely adding a touch of fuel to a raging fire, an excuse for extremist Muslims to blend the combustible mix of ignorance and violent zealotry.

Mock trial: A statement on the pastor’s political website, posted late Tuesday, said it would be re-broadcasting the trailer for the film as part of a day-long ‘International Judge Mohammad Day’ in which it subjected the Muslim prophet to a mock trial for “promoting murder, rape, and destruction of people and property through his writings called the Koran.”

While the approach of the filmmaker strikes me as vile, frankly, his claims on the whole, while mocking, are not absurd. The reaction to the film, on the other hand, is nothing if not extreme. It is heartbreaking to me, as I have been fool enough to hope that what was called the Arab Spring might become something lasting and positive. I could see quite early that it wasn't and the attacks in Egypt and Libya confirmed it for me. Long-mistreated people -- as those in Egypt and Libya have been for decades -- cannot change overnight. But we also cannot stand back and let the extremes rule the day, let alone more countries. It is heartbreaking to me. 

The founder of the Muslim faith expressed many things that are far removed from peaceful ideals, such as those of Jesus of Nazareth. The indoctrination of extremists in the Muslim World is well documented. The fear of non-zealot Muslims is also clear, as if the rational Muslims mostly hope if they ignore the extremists, they will go away. 

People have all the freedom to judge Christianity for the deplorable things that a slim minority of Christians claim, do or have done. They disparage the whole for the acts of a few. But don't you dare characterize the prophet's days on Earth as they were portrayed in full, or regard his worst zealot believers as dangerous! That's denying them religious freedom. Disgusting, two-faced and pandering. 

I hope we've had enough of this fantasy that was the Arab Spring, now that they've attacked us on our own ground, again, clearly intended to shock us and to kill Americans on the eleventh anniversary of the Ground Zero attacks, in two turbulent, extremist-charged nations. 

Pony up, Washington. This is no time to be apologizing. This appears to be time to stop pandering to dangerous factions. Again. 

Political campaigns or no campaigns, Mr. President and Congress. 

- Jon O. 

Posted via email from Jon Osterholm :: WMBC :: posterous

Saturday, September 8, 2012

Success. It is a messy road.

At Leadership Freak, "Something's always broken":
http://leadershipfreak.wordpress.com/2012/09/06/somethings-always-broken/

A very good quote from the link:

" The downside of improving is oppression. “Isn’t it ever good enough?” However, strong cultures create environments where the pursuit of better is expected, embraced, and enjoyed. "

Success is not for the spoiled, for those who cannot take bumps, those who think they deserve it from the outset, or those who cannot trust others who stick out their necks and fail on occasion (a fear of failure, a lack of long view in business development). Success is not for those who hide in the weeds along the sides of the facts, but who accept the struggles that the facts create. That is: hard work that is also - or eventually - smart work.

Of course, you've known or heard of "leaders" who basically use others. Leaders? No. Those who work hard for this type are, well, suckers. I've been a sucker in this sense, out of necessity, not blissfully ignorant of the situation, and never want to be there again.

It teaches. Those experiences can teach valuable lessons. Nothing creates a clearer picture of poor organizations and how NOT TO lead than some time in a company that is as dysfunctional as a bumbling criminal gang in a black comedy. Trying to effect change amidst business madness is a lesson in success.

Those who understand how oppressive failure is to the spirit can convey the necessity of some oppressive moments on the way to success.

Posted via email from Jon Osterholm :: WMBC :: posterous

Monday, June 18, 2012

Vero Beach Theatre Guild poised on edge of their seats for Genie Awards » TCPalm.com

The Vero Beach Theatre Guild's "Best Director and Production" of the season award went to "All My Sons," the first show of the 2011-2012 season. This play, a drama by Arthur Miller, was my first performance with this community theater. I was in the smaller, though pivotal, role of George Deever. I was extremely gratified that the season ticket holders felt the production was as good as I believed it was. I saw how much the leads and supporting actors put into this production, and how hard the crew worked at assuring it came together as neatly as it did. It is a particularly emotional story to present, and the four major players told it well -- thanks to their devotion as well as the director and other crew. 

The Guild's accolades are named the "Genies Awards" after a founder of the theater, which is one of the longest running community theaters in the state of Florida, founded in 1958. The Genie Awards Gala was held on Saturday, June 16, 2012, at the Elks Lodge in Vero Beach. 

A drama is fairly rare at this theater. Notably, there were several actor awards given to performers in it, from Best Newcomer to Best Actor. In the coming season, there are no dramas, but this win shows that the regular audience supports drama. A sidebar to a local media article promoting the event explains: "Genie judges are season ticket holders who volunteer to see at least one performance of each of the five main shows in the season, later voting on a variety of categories."

I would like to be able to do more drama, and some of us hope to help guide dramas into the mix at the Guild, in some form. 

Read the entire pre-event article here: Vero Beach Theatre Guild poised on edge of their seats for Genie Awards » on TCPalm.com

Some post-event pieces on the Genie Awards will be forthcoming from several of the local media outlets. Visit the Theatre Guild online at VBTG.net or find them on Facebook. 

- Jon Osterholm

Posted via email from Jon Osterholm :: WMBC :: posterous

Sunday, May 20, 2012

News Media Sale: Media General Sells 63 Papers to Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway

In a press release, Media General, based in Virginia, today announced an agreement with Berkshire Hathaway, for the latter to buy up dozens of  Southeast daily and weekly news products. 

There are some others going about this kind of media product collecting, but not at this massive rate.   

Media General, Inc. (NYSE: MEG) today announced that it has signed agreements with Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., (NYSE: BRK.A and BRK.B) for the purchase of newspapers and new financing.  A subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, BH Media Group, will purchase all of the newspapers owned by Media General, with the exception of the Tampa group, for $142 million in cash. Media General said it is in discussions with other prospective buyers for its Tampa print assets.

The newspapers being purchased by BH Media Group include 63 daily and weekly titles in Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Alabama, in addition to digital assets, including websites and mobile and tablet applications. The newspapers also have a substantial commercial printing business.

“These newspapers are great institutions and powerful brands in their respective markets,” said Terry Kroeger, president of BH Media Group.

The newspaper transaction is expected to close on June 25. 

An article from Warren Buffett's hometown paper's site, the Omaha World-Herald's Omaha.com, which his Berkshire Hathaway picked up in December 2011, offers some background and links to related stories:

Buffett to buy 63 newspapers

Warren Buffett made good Thursday [May 17, 2012] on his promise to buy more newspapers, agreeing to buy 63 daily and weekly newspapers in the Southeast for $142 million from financially troubled Media General Inc. of Richmond, Va.

Buffett said Thursday he may buy more newspapers. “Any time we can add properties we like, to management we like, at a price we like, we're ready to go.”

At the time he acquired the World-Herald, Buffett said he would not interfere with its editorial or news policies and he expected the newspaper company to continue doing its best work. He has a history of acquiring companies with good managers in place and letting them run their businesses with minimal control from his office.

Berkshire owns about 80 businesses with more than 300,000 employees, and Buffett has said he and his 20-person office rely on each company's managers to conduct their businesses as if they were the owners.

Buffett has often said that newspapers were an excellent business when the owner of a newspaper had “the only megaphone in town.” In 1992, before digital media arose, he said newspapers are “enormously valuable.”

But in 2009 he said, “For most newspapers in the United States, we would not buy them at any price. They have the possibility of going to just unending losses.”

In three short and tumultuous years, Buffett significantly modified his opinion of the business value of newspapers, seeing this large purchase. I mention this without any suggestion of wishy-washiness on his part, because news media is an industry that is anything but stagnant. Especially after desktop publishing and the Web changed things in two massive ways during the 1990s, news media has been an increasingly tough gamble for investment. 

No doubt, the price for these media products was enticing. Perhaps Buffett also went for this purchase since local "megaphones" (as he has called local papers) have taken a respectable footing in multimedia, and are treading water or swimming (and not drowning) financially, despite the vibrant growth of competing info-media, including television, the Web, blogs, and social media. I cite all of those as distractions from issue coverage as much as they can be legitimate sources of news. News is competing for attention with mind candy in all media -- such things as Dinner with Barack and "Keeping Up with the Kardashians" are not news, simply. 

“I think newspapers . . . have a decent future,” he said at the time. “It won't be like the past. But there are still a lot of things newspapers can do better than any other media. They not only can be sustained, but are important.”

At Berkshire's shareholders meeting May 5, Buffett was asked by a shareholder whether The World-Herald purchase involved “self-indulgence,” given the fact that Buffett loves newspapers and reads several each day.

Buffett replied that while newspapers are no longer the only source for some types of news ... they still deliver news and advertising information that people can't find elsewhere. He said he wanted to buy more newspapers in cities where people are interested in their communities.

The site also noted some factors about the company handing over some operations to Buffett, which I find worth quoting:

Media General, with 18 network-affiliated stations, said Thursday it expects strong TV advertising revenue this year from the political campaigns, the Olympics and the Super Bowl. It said its television stations accounted for 77 percent of its cash flow in 2011 and 87 percent in the first quarter of this year.

Media General originated as a newspaper company in Richmond in 1850 and later diversified into TV, selling stock as a public company in 1969. It has about 4,200 employees, having cut its workforce by nearly 35 percent since 2007.

Its presses print more than 150 publications for outside customers, including some markets for the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post and the New York Times. It has launched niche products, such as “Gotcha!,” which reports police incidents with mug shots of those arrested. And it has centralized some of its newspaper operations, producing the same national news pages for three of its daily newspapers at its Richmond office.

I can't help but connect this to other magnates, such as Sam Zell (to a lesser degree) and the Aussie media mega-magnate, Rupert Murdoch. This is an interesting move by the prolific and very diverse investor. 

- Jon Osterholm

Posted via email from Jon Osterholm :: WMBC :: posterous

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Crashed lunar orbiter may have been found

Cool thing of the week:

NASA scientists believe that they have spotted the crash site of a spacecraft set into orbit during the early 1960s. 

"They believe it is the missing Lunar Orbiter 2 which disappeared back in 1967 during a passage over the far side of the moon, when the craft went out of telescope and radio range.
Lunar Orbit 2′s primary function was documenting areas of the moon that would be most hospitable to the Apollo and Surveyor missions. During its run, it returned a total of 609 high resolution images and 208 medium-sized frames. This includes the Copernicus crater (pictured below) which is considered by many to be the Picture of the Century.

While the spacecraft was intentionally downed on October 11, 1967, scientists had yet to find the crash site -- til now.
The wreckage is thought to have been located by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) which is currently mapping the lunar surface in unprecedented detail. During its mission so far, the spacecraft has gathered more than 192 terabytes of data; that’s nearly 41,000 DVDs worth of data, images and maps! 

Read more, and see pictures the craft took, and a believed crash site photo: http://dsc.discovery.com/gear-gadgets/nasa-finds-lost-spacecraft-on-dark-side-of-the-moon.html

(Via Unexplained Mysteries site iGoogle module http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/viewnews.php?id=226949 )


- Jon Osterholm

Posted via email from Jon Osterholm :: WMBC :: posterous

Friday, May 11, 2012

9 out of 10...


"When I was a young man, I observed that nine out of 10 things I did were failures. I didn't want to be a failure, so I did 10 times more work."
--George Bernard Shaw,
Irish playwright

- Via the AOPA daily Aviation eBrief 

Posted via email from Jon Osterholm :: WMBC :: posterous

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Make Yours An Organization Of Entrepreneurs (FastCompany expert blogger)

Even if you're a big company, or a mid-sized one, at times you -- or leaders -- know or suspect that a spark of daring, challenge, an employee sense of ownership, or other active attitudes are lacking. Some folks have worked their entire career in large organizations where addressing any issue for one's self is not imagined, let alone attempted. But what leader wouldn't want to steal some fire from a startup to spark new growth or improved operations in his company? 

Perhaps to the point of cliche, statements such as "behave like a small business" are used. And they are not wrong. But they are often not understood in larger organizations because a career on the edge of poverty is not the sort of ownership ideal they embody. Because they've never lived it. That's no excuse for resisting a boost the creativity of a larger organization, though. 

To go there, it's a good idea to see what such entrepreneurs are doing, consider what resistance your organization has to those kinds of things, and have an involved discussion about which parties should approach things with an attitude of more devil-may-care than that's-not-my-job. It takes instruction, and it requires good examples for folks to follow. So get some examples, or create them, in your company.

 

The following blog post is not about boosting a mid-sized (500-1,000 employees) company, but how to staff up a startup. Leaders are good at thinking abstractly, and this might be a good piece to use as an analogy for converting a concrete operation into, well, at least a clay one. If not slipping, sliding mud. 

... Lots of startups begin with an original team of 2-4 people.
... We knew what we didn’t know and quickly identified the gaps -- a shrewd marketing head and a whole team of developers who could bring our vision to life. Soon after we needed more bodies on customer service, product development, and to create a stronger brand and voice. 
 
We liken the hiring process to completing a talent puzzle. First and foremost, we look for absurdly talented people. Then we figure out where they fit into the team.
 
It goes something like this:
1. Hire entrepreneurs: Entrepreneurs already possess the values, determination, and critical thinking to build successful businesses. They’re motivated, fast on their feet, and have original ideas. Entrepreneurs are smart people, but their drive is their biggest asset. Make them an integral part of your team and they’ll care about your business as much as you do.
2. Hire people better than you: Heading up a fast-growing company doesn’t allow you time to learn each and every facet in detail. You need to be able to trust the judgment and decisions of those you hire, and this only gets more important as you get bigger.
3. Look for flexibility: Our people have come from all over--banks, consultancies, and companies big and small. But they all possess the ability to respond to change and mobilize the necessary forces. Seek out people who welcome change and adapt easily. This is where you complete the puzzle: Harness their many talents to create new roles to fulfill your needs.
 
Holding on to Talent
Finding and hiring the right people is the first challenge, holding on to them the second. They’ve come to you because they see opportunity and inspiration in your company. Tap into those emotions to keep them motivated. 


The author, Jon Stein, then identifies three basic conditions under which he finds entrepreneurs thrive. Read the whole "expert blog" piece on FastCompany


- Jon Osterholm

Posted via email from Jon Osterholm :: WMBC :: posterous

Friday, April 20, 2012

Fenway Park turns 100

Happy birthday, Fenway Park!

From USA Today:  

"One hundred years to the day of the first regular season game played at Fenway, theRed Sox commemorate the centennial anniversary Friday before an afternoon game against the New York Yankees."

It's predecessor was Huntington Grounds: 

With unusual dimensions of 350 feet down the left-field line, 530 feet (expanded to 635 feet in 1908) to center and 280 feet to right, the Huntington Grounds featured a tool shed in deep center field that was in play and patches of sand where grass would not grow. The wooden-fenced stadium had a single turnstile, a main grandstand capable of seating 2,500 and held a total capacity of 11,500, though more than 15,000 crammed in for opening day in 1902.

By 1911, the venue had run its course. For one, the wooden structure was deemed a fire hazard.

With his lease on the Huntington Avenue Grounds expiring, General Charles H. Taylor, publisher of The Boston Globe and a real estate investor, began looking for property. He purchased an 8-acre parcel at auction for $120,000 from the Danas, one of the founding families of Massachusetts.

Bounded by Lansdowne Street to the north, Ipswich Street to the east and Jersey Street to the west, the largely undeveloped site was less than a mile from Huntington Avenue. It was located on the outskirts of the Fenway section of Back Bay, home to Boston's Opera House, Museum of Fine Arts and the winding gardens of Francis Olmstead....

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/al/redsox/story/2012-04-19/Fenway-Park-100th-anniversary/54422780/1


READ MORE  at USA Today, or check out these included links:

Posted via email from Jon Osterholm :: WMBC :: posterous

Monday, April 9, 2012

An ugly local tale of depravity and murder, dating to 1983 (Vero Beach)

A confessor to 6 killings, David Gore's execution tied to brutal rape, murder of Vero Beach girl, 17

http://www.tcpalm.com/news/2012/apr/09/a-confessor-to-6-killings-david-gores-execution/ 

When a panicked David Alan Gore bolted nude from his parents' home July 26, 1983, he charged after abducted teenager Lynn Elliott as she stumbled hands tied and naked down a long drive, fleeing a scene of rape and torture.

Her tormentor raised his revolver, shouted for her to stop, then fired a bullet over the 17-year-old's head. ... READ MORE

Posted via email from Jon Osterholm :: WMBC :: posterous

Sunday, March 18, 2012

Robbed: Salvaged Spanish treasure lands in wrong hands. Spain's.

So how about that? It seems that now the "finders keepers" concept no longer applies. On a big, international scale. 

Q: Do you run a socialist-leaning, economically mismanaged European country with good relations and military camaraderie with the United States? Feeling a bit... underfunded, or perhaps just insecure? 

A: If your once heavily colonizing nation lost a sunken treasure two centuries ago, and it is discovered and salvaged by entrepreneurs (and their financial backers, though they may have funded it themselves), and if you have some good lawyers, you can reclaim that property. 

Spain's last dictator -- Franco -- died in the 1970s (believe it or not), but a tyrannical approach by Spain seems like from pretty harsh tyrannical move to me. It is eschewing market, government and even schoolyard fairness, in a case of free enterprise versus what seems like some pretty blatant governmental collusion. It's not just Spain's shame here: the United States court system decided that Spain deserved the sunken gold back after two centuries, free and clear. As if it cost the salvage company nothing to find the ship and pull up the gold. 

The rules have apparently changed, and a some minor type of tyranny (feels major, to the entrepreneurs, perhaps) has been endorsed above the most noble and time-tested economic rule: finders keepers, loser weepers. 

I'd read that the United States was rumored to be considering compensating the salvage company, but that has not happened yet. Judging from the quotes by the salvage company, in the following piece by Reuters, I'd say that it's unlikely, in the short term. The fact is, apparently, that the salvage company isn't getting so much as a sloppy kiss from Spain or the USA after getting... you know. 

Spanish treasure lands after 200 years | Reuters
 
...The [American-based salvage] company said it would abide by the ruling, although a spokeswoman said it "flies in the face of all legal precedent." 

Says the government's empty bag of flesh with no soul but a smooth tongue, aka, the government's (Spain's) consulting lawyer:
"This a victory for Spain and the United States," lawyer Jose Maria Lancho, who advised the Spanish government in its action against Odyssey, told Reuters.

"For Spain, this sunken ship, this archaeological site, is still a warship and we still have jurisdiction over what has happened to it."
 
The Spanish government plans to restore, conserve and catalogue the contents of the 17-tonne cargo, which it estimates to be worth 373 million euros ($496 million).


This seems to me to be a case of a few governments (figuratively, and financially) running over some enterprising people, and then backing up over them again. Less doleful, namby-pamby thinkers would call this tyranny. Not the Nazis marginalizing Jews in Poland in the 1940s kind of tyranny, no, but a form of tyranny still. (Like when eminent domain amounts to a local government's abuse of power to put a condo where 500 retirees had lived for decades, or to take people's homes at below-market price in order to put in an interstate off-ramp to please the wealthy investors putting in a new mall. Or something. Kinda like that.)

The state denying reasonable rights and freedoms to people who have not committed any crimes whatsoever is tyrannical, plain and simple. Taking piles of gold, discovered fairly and legally, from those who salvaged it, with scant remuneration (if any?) is tyrannical. If it isn't, then tell me what it is, well short of writing a dissertation on it. 

I am just not happy about this. Are you familiar with the economic shorthand, "PIGS"? It identifies the European states which are providing the greatest threat to economic stability in Europe (PIGS: Portugal, Ireland, Greece, and, ahem, Spain) and the countries who are invested in, and connected to, those economies. That would be you, most likely. 

Way to hold down the free market spirit of people, Spain and USA! Happy-face fascism is winning the day. 

Spain could at least name a government building after the salvage company, Odyssey Marine Exploration. But they won't, I expect. Why should they? They're the government. They determine what's fair, and if you disagree, well, they're the government. Freedom isn't free, and you can't even pay your way to uncovering lost gold without getting jerked over, based on this ludicrous and unjust action. 


-  Jon Osterholm

Posted via email from Jon Osterholm :: WMBC :: posterous

Sunday, February 12, 2012

COMMENTARY: Whitney Houston, child gospel singer, 1980s pop superstar, and addict, dies at 48

Desperation knows no economic threshold nor is it admiring of the successful, famous or talented. If the ingredients are suitable to it, desperation will callously poison anyone. 
In the 1980s, I was a young lad, and Whitney Houston was to me what I suppose Madonna was to other young males -- fans of pop music, and with an eye for gorgeous, talented young females. I found Whitney fascinating. The air about Whitney in the 1980s was not fake, I didn't believe then or now. She wasn't flailing eccentricity for attention, nor placing sex appeal above talent in her image. Whitney was something refreshing that came out of a generally pre-packaged, often overproduced, under-creative, inorganic, and haughty pop music industry of the 1980s. 
Houston's images on her album covers (they still sold vinyl albums and cassette tapes, then, Kiddo) -- the pleasant, happy, fit and svelte Nubian goddess -- were far above what Madonna was, for me. It is not that Madonna wasn't impressive, just that, in the 1980s, for me, she was... no Whitney Houston. 
In 1985, Whitney was the sweet Christian girl who made it big: attractive but not loose, energetic while not clawing at walls, talented and not a feckless showoff. Her mother was a gospel star, for goodness sake! 
Whitney Houston Dies at 48 
(found at The Music Mix on EW.com; an AP article - http://music-mix.ew.com/2012/02/11/whitney-houston-dies/)
She seemed to be born into greatness. She was the daughter of gospel singer Cissy Houston, the cousin of 1960s pop diva Dionne Warwick and the goddaughter of Aretha Franklin


Houston first started singing in the church as a child. [Then,] music mogul Clive Davis first heard Houston perform.


“The time that I first saw her singing in her mother’s act in a club … it was such a stunning impact,” Davis told [ABC Television program] Good Morning America
Whitney Houston recorded an inspirational ballad, "The Greatest Love of All," for her 1985 debut album -- which every parent, every HUMAN, ought to hear and absorb for it's message, and for those amazing pipes bringing the message. It is a moving recording on two fronts: smooth musical energy and the inspiring lyrics. It was not her biggest hit, not the biggest from the album, even. But it was a hit, and for many, including me, a meaningful song. Arguably, it was corny; some scoff at the song for its unashamed love-the-children and love yourself message, but it was philosophically positively meaningful. Not bubble gum pop music. 
By contrast with that other aforementioned pop star of the 1980s, "Greatest Love" would not have fit with Madonna's other hits. Two of Madonna's many hits from 1985 were "Like a Virgin" and "Material Girl"; others were less topically shallow. (Catchy? Yes. Fun? Enjoyable? Definitely. Deep, classy and inspiring? Noooooooo.) Don't misread me, I am not knocking Madonna totally, but drawing a comparison on cultural influence and aesthetic packaging of them, in the 1980s when they both hit it big.
I don't want to believe that Whitney was a fated addict who became a superstar, only to fall to those addiction issues. I want to believe she was someone whose personality, talent and natural joyfulness, her soul, let's say, met with fame, celebrity and fortune as if the latter were slow-working poisons. I want to believe that the child gospel singer who became a world renowned celebrity sought refuge from fame, found love in Bobby Brown, and submerged herself in addictions. To Brown, drugs and sex. 
It's a theme that goes around and around everyday, at every socioeconomic level: People don't know all of what they are made of, and what they do know they gather only in pieces and, sometimes, when we recognize something destructive about our makeup, it may be too late to build walls tall enough to protect us from it.   
Fame and fortune affect people differently, as do alcohol, drugs, sex, cigarettes, or you-name-it. Some can often drink themselves stupid and never actually crave a drink, for example. Some can drink amply yet manage to effectively function in the vital parts of their lives; some are not so fortunate. Addicts aren't made, really, they are born. But they are made, as well, because the ingredients have to be right. Whitney Houston, despite her Christian roots, her talents, her ability to keep it together at one time, collapsed when her addictions awakened. 
I want to believe that Whitney struggled with the stark contrast between talented success and its trappings, and a human, private existence. I want to believe that Whitney, the good Christian girl, crumbled from the impact of fame, fortune, and the ironies of a life in the public eye that does not meld well with a personal life. 
I don't want to accept that her encouraging beginnings, and the control Whitney had over her life, mattered little when she awakened addiction issues had been dormant in her until she and Bobby Brown became bittersweet parts of each other's lives. 
By the time Whitney had been smoking pot laced with cocaine with husband Bobby Brown, as she admitted to Oprah Winfrey in 2009 (see the Oprah.com interview text, from 2009), the addiction beast inside her had gained, apparently, a terrible control over her psyche. I was a stark contrast to her early life. In the much-publicized Oprah interview of September 2009, Whitney said that she was glad Bobby Brown had some control over her, because at the time she had control over everything else in her life.
Whitney: They don't have any idea about that sweet, gentle tenderness about him that nobody knew. He was a very quiet person. When that entertainer came out onstage, he did that thing. But at home, he was very much the father. He was very much the man. He was very much in control. I liked that because I was in control of all my stuff, and here he comes along and everybody was like, "Wow, she's got somebody now." When he said something, I listened. I was very interested in having someone have that control over me. It was refreshing.  


Oprah: It was refreshing because in every other aspect of your life—  


Whitney: I was in control.
Eventually, though, the relationship crumbled into this: 
Whitney: We were lacing our marijuana with base. We weren't on crack. We weren't on no crack stuff. We weren't buying $20 jumbos. We were paying money. We were buying kilos and ounces and ounces. We would have our stash. 
"I was very interested in having someone have that control over me," Whitney had said of Brown. Sadly, in addition to Brown's emotional meaning for her, he envied her fame, and was her partner in destructive drug and sex binges. He involved her in a depraved reality show, albeit willingly on her part because she wanted to be (in her thinking, inexplicable to me) the good wife. The show was chiefly an advertisement for in-patient addiction recovery and male insecurity, in my view, being only a freakish display of the mess that was their personal lives. It was his selfish, seemingly last-ditch effort to retain some sort of fame. For what that was worth. What it proved to do was show just how low Whitney had gone, and, certainly, Bobby Brown before her. 

Was it worth it, Bobby Brown? Fame isn't meant to be an overt goal, not to mentally stable people, but a result of something... worthwhile. One accomplishes things that bring fame, fame as a goal in and of itself is narcissism or some similar mental disorder. Did you get that, Bobby? Or was your reality show raising money for the starving in Africa, secretly? Bobby?

Was Whitney's fall and her death, ultimately, Bobby Brown's fault? No. He didn't help, sadly. But addiction is illness, like allergies. He may have introduced her to her addictions, but he didn't create them. (I think he's a shallow, selfish creep, but that's another matter.)  
The affect of mixing a personality with fame is not predictable (not always, for sure). One would not conclude, easily, that a child gospel singer who became world-renowned pop singer -- who lacked morose eccentricities, exploitative nude photos of herself, extreme behavior tendencies, crude quotations, and general bawdiness -- would be destined decades later to become as famous for being a junkie and suffering addict as she had been for being a smooth-voiced, stunner of a pop star. But, such a disaster can happen to anyone, if the many ingredients mix in the right manner. 
Whitney didn't fade quickly. But, she did fade. It was a maudlin site for an admirer such as me, so I can only imagine how it was for those close to her to see her crumbling, and not be able to do enough to help her get herself right. 
Whitney had resurfaced several times, with hope. And her amazing moments were not all in the 1980s, or all album hits and movie performances. Especially notable was, in 1991, when she sang a stunning "The Star-Spangled Banner" at the Super Bowl, mere days after Desert Storm had begun. The performance was so good that it was made into a single that raised money for charity.
She offered some fresh work in the 2000s, and it got respect though it was not the huge success of the 1980s and 1990s. In 2009, "I Look to You" became her seventh studio album, released in 2009. It sold more than 300,000 copies in its first week. (A new album was rumored in 2008 that, in fact, proved to be only a fake cover of an album called "Undefeated". In that cover image, the woman who was supposed to be Whitney looked amazing. That album never surfaced, and was called out as a hoax by an RCA executive.)
There were several remix albums put out by RCA Records up to 2009, according to the company's Web page of her RCA/Arista albums (RCA took over, then dissolved, Arista, the label she'd long been under). On RCA's artist page, it said, simply (prior to any posthumous changes):


170 million albums, singles, and videos sold worldwide. The only artist in history to chart seven consecutive #1 Billboard Hot 100 hits. Highest selling single of all time with “I Will Always Love You”.  
 And, the RCA Web page cited:
“the most awarded female artist of all time” - The Guinness Book of World Records.
What I want to believe is that the young gospel singer Whitney Houston fell later in life because celebrity crippled her, not that the dormant addict inside her awoke and destroyed her, much as a cancer kills. But, what I want to believe is probably incorrect. At least, not fully accurate. 
The contrasts of Whitney Houston's positive beginnings and joyful rise to stardom to her destruction and death, are a lesson. They are a lesson on the rigors and risks of living, of the importance of knowing one's self. Her life story is not one to be romanticized as the shooting star that comes of fame. Her loss is too human and, somehow, deliberate, for it to be akin to, for instance, the sudden losses of Buddy Holly, Patsy Cline or Jim Croce (all from plane crashes). 
The tragic lesson from her life and death, similar to Michael Jackson, Elvis Presley, Marilyn Monroe, Brittany Murphy, Heath Ledger, and many, many other famous people, is that nothing can take the place of being a well-grounded human being, and staying grounded. Fame, fortune and glory are cheap by comparison. The lesson to grasp from Whitney's life and death, in brief, is that being grounded is a moving target for us all, more or less. And when being grounded takes a back seat, we will lose. 
Desperation knows no economic threshold nor is it admiring of the successful, famous or talented. How we choose to attempt victory over desperation is what will matter. It really is that simple. In practice, it's not often that simple. 

Rest in peace, free from addiction, and from the combustible mix of addiction with fame, fortune and celebrity, in contrast to simply being human, Whitney. 


- JON OSTERHOLM